There seem to be two separate things going on here. First, NVIDIA's driver is keying on Unreal Tournament 2003 and activating the "lightweight" trilinear filtering method present in pre-44.03 drivers in order to boost benchmark scores. NVIDIA claimed the "Quality" setting in the 44.03 drivers would banish this lightweight trilinear method, and for the most part, that was true. Except where it was untrue
FutureMark Statement: Futuremark now has a deeper understanding of the situation and NVIDIA's optimization strategy. In the light of this, Futuremark now states that NVIDIA's driver design is an application specific optimization and not a cheat.
NVIDIA Statement: NVIDIA works closely with developers to optimize games for GeForceFX. These optimizations (including shader optimizations) are the result of the co-development process. This is the approach NVIDIA would have preferred also for 3DMark03.
Translation VIA HardOCP: FutureMark reneges on previous statements and confirms NVIDIA was not cheating on their benchmark and NVIDIA will not take a legal action against FutureMark that would bankrupt them.
"Recently, there have been questions and some confusion regarding 3DMark 03 results obtained with certain Nvidia" products, Futuremark said in the statement. "We have now established that Nvidia's Detonator FX drivers contain certain detection mechanisms that cause an artificially high score when using 3DMark 03."
The real question being, is NVidia dropping image quality to inflate those scores? If NVidia is simply adjusting how their driver reacts to the application to improve performance without hindering the quality, then I dont see the problem. Just about all hardware vendors do this to make sure their stuff works with the most popular game engines. Also keep in mind that NVidia (among others) has been vocal in the past about the latest 3DMark not being a very good benchmark, that could play a part in Futuremark not exactly being thrilled with NVidia and perhaps trying throw some bad mojo their way. update: It seems that ATI is also being looked at and I'm just blind (Thanks Rick):
update: Here is some stuff NVidia is accused of doing.Our investigations reveal that some drivers from ATI also produce a slightly lower total score on this new build of 3DMark03. The drop in performance on the same test system with a Radeon 9800 Pro using the Catalyst 3.4 drivers is 1.9%. This performance drop is almost entirely due to 8.2% difference in the game test 4 result, which means that the test was also detected and somehow altered by the ATI drivers. We are currently investigating this further.
The core clock rate of the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra will be 450MHz, down 50MHz from the NV30 chip in the GeForceFX 5800 Ultra. The GeForce FX 5900 Ultra 256MB should be available in June, if all goes as planned, for only $499 American money. A non-Ultra variant of the GeForce FX 5900 with 128MB should hit the market in June for $399, but core and memory clock speeds for that product have not been finalized. Tantalizingly, NVIDIA has plans to introduce a cheaper 128MB "value" card based on NV35, as well. This card should be available in July for the bargain-basement price of $299.NVidia's official press release can be found here.
Chief Executive Jen-Hsun Huang said the company will launch its new graphics chip, code-named "NV35," next week. It will replace the company's prior top-end product, code-named NV30, which Huang said was unsuccessful.
Under the terms of the deal, Nvidia hardware will become the "preferred" graphics platform for Electronic Arts's video game studios, and video games developed by Electronic Arts may offer features designed to work on Nvidia hardware.
As to what defines "preferred" has yet to be revealed. Thanks HardOCP
the GeForceFX 5800 Ultra will never make it to retail. Those of you that PreBuy the cards will still get an Ultra model with the FX Flow cooling unit. Those who don't will have the opportunity to get the non-Ultra version (400/800) off the retail shelves for a price of US$300.00.
To compound things a bit more, word from the ATI camp is that their next cards based on the R350 chips are already on the production line in significant numbers. What's this mean? It means yay for market competition! I cant wait to see what NVidia does next later this year.
- HardOCP
- AnandTech
- TomsHardware
- ExtremeTech
One thing to keep in mind though is that as always these are early drivers, and performance gains will probably happen... Enough to trade up? Hrm... yeah you might wanna ponder that one for a bit and see what ATI's new card looks like in a month or two. AMAZING NOTE: As really insightful and clever as those 'LOL 3DFX'd!' and 'NVidia is doomed!' posts are, we're gonna mark them as stupid just to be rebelious.
Advertisement